This post was contributed by a community member. The views expressed here are the author's own.

Health & Fitness

Lakewood #1 in State for Bikini Coffee?

Should the Oakbrook area coffee stand become a bikini barista bar, Lakewood would rank number one in the state for most scantily-clad coffee pouring places per populace.

Should the Oakbrook area Black Star Coffee stand become a bikini barista hangout/drive-by/dispensary . . . for coffee and other things they sell, Lakewood would slide into fourth place state-wide in the “Ordering-Espresso-Can-Be-Fun!” category. 

Even though two “Grab-n-Go” Everett locations had arrests for two much show, not enough go, still it’s revealing that Everett remains at the top - less conspicuous in size than 2nd place Seattle, the two neighboring cities boasting 13 and 9 coffee stands along their respective strips.  

Next is Kent with 8 stands -- and two arrests recently for violation of the Adult Entertainment Ordinance (I thought they were selling coffee?) -- then Tacoma and finally Lakewood round out the state leaders. 

Find out what's happening in Lakewood-JBLMwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Noteworthy, if the Black Star becomes a bikini coffee bar, Lakewood will climb from a pantywaist into a tie with its bigger city just to the north with sex, er six, expressive espressos.

Air Way Heights finishes at the bikini-bottom with only one night stand for coffee but it certainly has aspirations given the “Sin City Espresso” name, complete with a Vegas, Nevada banner on its website and pictures of what they offer.

Find out what's happening in Lakewood-JBLMwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Six bikini coffee stands for Lakewood however will mean this itzy-bitsy-teenie-weenie city won’t be any longer as it will now boast the title ‘first in thirst’ for the entire State of Washington with the most scantily-clad coffee pouring places per populace. 

Not too shabby for a city hoping to expose itself to the country what with a video -- that might now have to be re-edited to include these Points of Interest -- the Lakewood Chamber produced a while back featuring our local gambling and casino watering holes. 

Though a barista in a string-bikini rankles some, what with Lakewood ranking Number One, CBS News might want to pay a return visit to Washington to run a follow-up story on our state’s incidents of indecency and prostitution that always seems to stir the controversy -- not to mention the coffee -- with the establishment of such establishments. 

Featuring our city’s new notoriety, we’d have all the free publicity we could most certainly use in this watered-down economy.

At first glance, or blush, it’s remarkable how serving coffee in such a small shanty --  a drive-through at that -- can cause such a brew-haha until, upon further inspection, you realize maybe it’s not about what’s in the cup. 

Take Cowgirls Espresso for example (yes, Lakewood has one of those too), judged “Sexiest Coffee Shop” in America by Maxim Magazine.  Just this past April 15 the cowgirls attended the Fort Lewis Sponsors Dinner where they helped serve.  Food.

Just ogle on Google the number of times crime is connected with certain kinds of coffee.

So what can be done, other than saving room for scream? 

Last month, the City Commission in Shelton enacted a six-month moratorium on applications for new sexually oriented businesses (SOB’s – Lakewood’s own abbreviation).  Imagine including “drive-through coffee stands featuring scantily clad employees” in the SOB category.  But they are. In Shelton.

Another option might be to apply the three-prong standard or Miller Test which would, to my way of thinking, read as follows with only minor editing (parenthesis) on my part:

One: "whether the average person (I think I qualify), applying contemporary community standards (see, community does matter), would find the service, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest – “having or encouraging an excessive interest in sexual matters.”   

Well, it sure as heck ain’t the coffee the purveyors themselves are promoting.

Two: “whether the work depicts or describes in a patently offensive way - “considered to be openly, plainly, or clearly visible as offensive to the viewing public” - sexual conduct . . . (I deleted the rest of this definition since this is a family newspaper but certainly some of the links provided in this article should give you an idea). 

Three: “whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.” 

Well, that’s certainly not a Rembrandt in the window.  Being a drive-through there’s no time to be reading literary works.  It’s doubtful those in the bikinis are gonna get elected looking like that – I mean, right? 

And scientific value?  Have you tasted their coffee?

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here

The views expressed in this post are the author's own. Want to post on Patch?

More from Lakewood-JBLM