.
Feedback

Congressman-Elect Denny Heck Comments On Passing of Sen. Daniel Inouye

Senator Inouye played a critical role in the historic 1988 Puyallup Land Claims Settlement, Heck says.

Congressman-elect Denny Heck has released the following statement regarding the passing of U.S. Senator Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii):

I was deeply saddened to learn yesterday of the passing of Daniel Inouye. Though a Hawaii Senator, his work had a deep impact on Washington State.

Senator Inouye played a critical role in the historic 1988 Puyallup Land Claims Settlement. The settlement drastically improved the quality of life for members of the Puyallup Tribe and spurred significant economic development at the Port of Tacoma and in the cities of Tacoma and Fife. Congressman Norm Dicks has stated in the past that the settlement could not have occurred without the work of Senator Inouye. The settlement laid the groundwork for the revitalization that has taken place in Tacoma and other parts of Pierce County over the past three decades. Our state owes Senator Inouye a debt of gratitude for his work.

Senator Inouye was also a true American hero. He lost his arm charging Italian machine gun nests in World War II and was awarded the Medal of Honor for his actions. He was the first Japanese-American to serve in the United States House of Representatives and the first to serve in the United States Senate.

Senator Inouye’s country will miss him dearly. My deepest condolences go out to his family, friends and colleagues during this difficult time.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Lakewood-JBLM Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
steve swortz May 14, 2013 at 09:43 pm
David you can say that again.
David Anderson May 14, 2013 at 10:52 am
Despite your protestations to the contrary Steve, the Lakewood City Council does have aRead More responsibility and has established precedent on such businesses. Lakewood Ordinance #358 (November, 2004) consisted of 22 pages that included references to statistics nation-wide concerning the harmful secondary effects of Sexually Oriented Businesses (SOB’s – Lakewood’s own designation) upon communities; findings of a variety of stakeholders including “representatives from businesses, educational institutions, community leaders, and representatives from the adult entertainment industry;” research and study by the Planning Advisory Board citing case law and neighboring city’s ordinances affecting adult entertainment facilities; and the resulting action, based on this research, found that “an improperly operated SOB can constitute a public or moral nuisance.” This research was conducted in keeping with Lakewood’s purpose “to protect, foster and support the goals and ideals of schools, religious and public service organizations serving the Lakewood community.”
JM Simpson May 14, 2013 at 10:30 am
I agree with the comment that the City of Lakewood wants businesses locating here. The more theRead More businesses, the more the tax revenue. The more the revenue, the more the services. No argument there. What the City and many of its citizens do not want is businesses which do not fall within standard moral parameters. Coffee stands with near naked young women - who would be arrested for indecent exposure if they were to walk down the street dressed as they are in such coffee stands - does not meet that standard. Moreover, potential business owners who want to locate to Lakewood may decide not to because they may not want to do business in a city that seems to have little concern for civic and moral standards. Ah standards, what troublesome things they are. Then again, most adults do understand that moral standards matter to their families and community and, yes, businesses. So in your efforts to spend your money where you wish you argue that coffee stands that offer a peep show with the coffee is a better way of improving Lakewood's business environment when in reality it can do just the opposite? How is that smart?